foreigners pay double on southern great walks

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12063439
43 comments
41–43 of 43

@FrankB - It's not supposed to be fair and equitable. The want to price match demand, encourage tourists to want to do other than the heavily subscribed walks, while giving Kiwis a chance (preference) in getting to those places.
And what that means, if it works, is more upgrades, price hikes & booking systems on the next tier of tracks. Greenstone-Caples, Rees-Dart, Powell-Jumbo ... what next? We can try and guess, but whichever it is it'll be another area of undeveloped backcountry upgraded & uppriced.
As said earlier, I support a border levy and increased money from central government. The split pricing makes foreigners feel picked on as they don’t consider the tax contribution Kiwis make to the maintenance. In my opinion it is likely to result in commando camping and trampers moving to other location. This is precisely why I think split pricing is not going to work - it will move the issue and force infrastructure investments elsewhere to keep up with demand, rather than increasing overall income for maintenance and protection of our back country.

This thread branched to "An incoming Tourist Tax" on . Explore the branch (19 messages).

41–43 of 43

Sign in to comment on this thread.

Search the forums

Forum Tracks, routes, and huts
Started by waynowski
On 2 June 2018
Replies 42
Permanent link

Formatting your posts

The forums support MarkDown syntax. Following is a quick reference.

Type this... To get this...
Italic *Italic text* *Italic text*
Bold **Bold text** **Bold text**
Quoted text > Quoted text > Quoted text
Emojis :smile: :+1: :astonished: :heart: :smile: :+1:
:astonished: :heart:
Lists - item 1
- item 2
- item 3
- item 1 - item 2 - item 3
Links https://tramper.nz https://tramper.nz
Images ![](URL/of/image)

URL/of/image
![](/whio/image/icons/ic_photo_black_48dp_2x.png)
Mentions @username @username

Find more emojiLearn about MarkDown