Mid Styx hut Feb 2009 • By glennj. Licence: C.

Most  individuals who frequent the New Zealand back country associate the name permolat with the thin metal markers used to mark tracks. These markers, usually white, were used for approximately  three decades by the New Zealand Forest Service (NZFS) to mark official tracks. Post 1987 the Department of Conservation (DOC)  phased out permolat markers and switched to orange plastic triangle markers. In some areas DOC removed the permolat markers when erecting orange triangles. For various reasons including lack of funding DOC failed to maintain all of  the vast network of tracks inherited from the NZFS. By the early  2000’s there were hundreds of kilometres of permolat marked tracks that were no longer being maintained by DOC . In many instances huts on such  tracks were not being maintained, or were receiving  just minimal maintenance. These huts were also under threat of removal because of lack of use. A situation had developed where some huts were ear-marked for removal because of their lack of use and deteriorating  condition, yet this situation had largely occurred because the tracks to these huts had become overgrown.



In 2003 Hokitika raised Andrew Buglass who was very concerned about the potential loss of huts & tracks in Westland decided to achieve  something beyond individual effort  by mobilising others to help with the cause. In a two pronged approach he founded a website and started a group for like minded enthusiasts who were prepared to do something about the maintenance and preservation of back country huts and tracks. The group is named “Permolat” after the track markers on the types of tracks no longer being officially maintained.  The website is called “Remote Huts Westland”

 

 

Permolat members are active on the western side of the Southern Alps and focus on assets that are unmaintained or minimally maintained by DOC.  They are involved with cutting and marking tracks, hut maintenance, providing up to date track/hut/ route information and lobbying for the interests of users of remote back country. Currently Permolat has 170 members. There is no membership fee and work is unpaid. DOC sometimes assists with materials or helicopter time but Permolat is mainly reliant on member goodwill and donations of money and materials.  Currently more could be done if there was more money and labour.  Anyone keen to be involved can find out how to become a member or how to donate to the cause by visiting the website. Here is the address "http://remotehuts.onlinegroups.net/about/"

Mt Brown hut & beyond Dec 2010 • By glennj. Licence: C.

 

Permolat  has achieved much in its decade of existence. Numerous tracks are being maintained that would otherwise overgrow and many huts are receiving maintenance that DOC is unable to do. Such work has certainly ensured that some remote huts are receiving more visits than they used to and are thus less likely to be candidates for removal. Permolat has taken responsibility for or assisted others  with five hut / bivvy  “Maintain by Community” agreements  with DOC.  Three more similar agreements are in the pipeline. As an example; the second  agreement was for Mid Styx hut and was signed by Permolat member Mark Mellsop of Hokitika. Two working bees saw this hut repiled, re floored and a new concrete hearth constructed. A woodshed was built, some painting done and rodent control undertaken.  At the same time tracks in the vicinity of the hut, which are not maintained by DOC, were upgraded by Permolat.

Additional to the Maintain by Community agreements a community project that constructed a hut on Mt Brown was supported by Permolat by way of monetary donation and labour from members.

 

Permolat’s “Remote Huts Westland” website has become the first choice source of information for up to date hut, track and route information for a host of the more remote Westland huts attracting a big following  beyond the Permolat membership. DOC even has links to the Remote Huts website for those seeking information on huts & routes that they no longer or only minimally maintain.

 

The Permolat example of a group of active enthusiasts  doing something about  the preservation and maintenance of huts and tracks in Westland is a model that could no doubt be replicated in other parts of the country.  Andrew is prepared to share the website template if other like minded people wish to start up a group with similar goals elsewhere in the country. A Ruahine group has been the first to take up this offer and they now have their own part of the Remote Huts website.

 

 

 We may feel nostalgia for the days when the NZ Forest Service provided  a “gold plated” free network of huts and tracks but  sadly those days  have gone.  The current reality is that DOC  struggles for funding and spending on remote assets that receive low visitor numbers is low priority. User involvement such as undertaken by Permolat is likely to have to become more common in the future or assets will be lost.  As users of remote backcountry perhaps we should be asking ourselves, “what contribution can I make to ensure we keep or enhance back country assets”? 

 

 

glennj  (Permolat member since 2007)