DoC to charge visitors more on Great Walks

"Conservation Minister Maggie Barry told a meeting at the National Party annual conference on Saturday that part of the $76 million in Budget funding for the Department of Conservation would be spent on a new computer system to enable "differential pricing", allowing DOC to charge international tourists more than New Zealanders when they booked walks on tracks such as the Milford, Routeburn and Kepler. Referring to recent calls for a levy on arriving international visitors, Barry said: "We won't be putting a border tax on, that's not how we roll. "But what we are doing with that new computer system, which is part of that $76m, we are investing into a modern, fit-for-purpose DOC computer system to take bookings. "We will be doing differential charging so visitors who actually use our estates (as opposed to visitors who just come to New Zealand who don't actually go out into the DOC estate) but visitors who actually go on our walks will be paying more – substantially more - to access the huts than New Zealanders." https://www.newsroom.co.nz/2017/06/25/35804/foreign-trampers-to-pay-higher-prices Has anyone thought this through? What is the ROI on spending $76m to charge overseas visitors more on just the Great Walks? Because while Barry has referenced a couple of well-known tracks, she's left the door wide open to a booking system that charges for ALL hut access. And that doesn't feel right either. What it does feel like is another step along the path of commercialising DoC as a state owned tourism operation. It will do nothing to address the much wider and chronic underfunding of DoC in terms of it's conservation role, and in the huts themselves it creates a 'two class' system of visitors and locals. I still much prefer a border tax; small and efficient. The vast majority of visitors to this country are here because of the Conservation estate to some degree.
35 comments
31–35 of 35

yes but for the same money as a motel you could day walk on a great walk for free and go back and enjoy the comfort of a motel or a few nights in a campground.... thats what people are tossing up doing with their money, get a motel room for the whole family for several nights for what it costs foreigners to stay in a great walks hut for a night....... you could do two day walks at either end of the routeburn and cover most if not all of it for $ fees on the track... if you can work out transport at the other end in time you can do the whole thing in a long day if you're fit enough... so the overnighters are subsidising a percetage of the track that massive no's of day walkers do....
Yes I believe you. Done 15h in rain and cold from the Flats to Howden with a 65L pack for two (and too much gear). I was ok, but my significant one wasn't too happy about it :D We would have liked proper bookings, more evenly spaced (say the Falls and MacKenzie) but couldn't book them with only 6 weeks notice. On the other hand there were plenty of people booking just one night and returning to their car afterwards.
howden hut isnt great. it was expanded for more people but the main eating space is barely adequate... feels like a prison when its full in bad weather. one bunk room with 28 bunks... I spent the night above someone who was loudly hoiking up flem half the night. you too can have this experience for $70 a night, or $140 a night if you are a foreigner...
I didn't want Howden (and yes it was bad in the night, but it was us who woke people after hiking 15 hours that day. And then we fidgeted forever being soaked wet.), but rather Luxmore (and Falls rather then the Flats respectively), but couldn't book them without enough advance notice for my work trip (something like 2 months or less, I forgot): hence my suggestion to reserve some space say up to a month advance, for people who book two consecutive nights in huts trying to actually do the traverse (as compared to some that just go back to end they came from and their cars). As for the eating space at Howden, people were sleeping there as well and wet gear was all over the place. Anyhow if I ever make it make to NZ, won't be probably doing great walks anymore.
great walks arent so bad in good weather at the huts, people can spread themselves around outside, but when the weather is rough, you've got up to 50 people crammed in and some of the huts barely cope with the numbers. plus you've got wet gear hanging all over the place, a tiny stove in a large communal area. its one thing to be in a small packed hut, but a large packed huts arent great if you dont like noisy crowds..
Thumbs up
1
31–35 of 35

Sign in to comment on this thread.

Search the forums

Forum The campfire
Started by PhilipW
On 26 June 2017
Replies 34
Permanent link

Formatting your posts

The forums support MarkDown syntax. Following is a quick reference.

Type this... To get this...
Italic *Italic text* *Italic text*
Bold **Bold text** **Bold text**
Quoted text > Quoted text > Quoted text
Emojis :smile: :+1: :astonished: :heart: :smile: :+1:
:astonished: :heart:
Lists - item 1
- item 2
- item 3
- item 1 - item 2 - item 3
Links https://tramper.nz https://tramper.nz
Images ![](URL/of/image)

URL/of/image
![](/whio/image/icons/ic_photo_black_48dp_2x.png)
Mentions @username @username

Find more emojiLearn about MarkDown