• bigpaul When i said people i wasnt nessecarily including myself in that i dont think Ill ever get to pmcke,s standard.
  29 March 2010
• matthew Yes I'm all for that. It will happen at some stage.
  29 March 2010
• bigpaul Ive often thought pmcke that Mathew could appoint you as assistant to the assistant administrator for special changes. And as much as thats a joke there are quite a few corrections that could be performed by suitable people taht could only help the site and mathew
  29 March 2010
• pmcke Yes, looks great now. Sorry about pointing that out , there is something about me that likes to see things in the right place. I would love to go and fix locations for many of the other photos here that I know have wrong locations or no locations at all.
  26 March 2010
• bridgetramper should be fixed now?! thanks for the help!
  26 March 2010
• pmcke If you go to edit the photo and replace the location with E1861590, N5587718 that should fix it. You are the only one who can do this as it is your photo.
  23 March 2010
• bridgetramper ooh sorry, that is my fault! I don't know how to fix it though?!! Sorry everyone!!
  23 March 2010
• pmcke My guess is that it is Purity judging by the other pics that bridgetramper has uploaded. I think what has happened is that she has been looking at my GPX of the Waipakihi and has then clicked add photograph, not realising that it will associate it witht he GPX file.
  21 March 2010
• john dutchie This is Purity or there's another hut around that looks very similar.I was there a year or so ago and i'm sure my memory hasn't faded that badly.
  21 March 2010
• matthew Is it Purity Hut?
  21 March 2010
• pmcke There's something wrong here. There is no hut at that location. This doesn't look like a Kaimanawa Hut at all.
  20 March 2010

About this photograph

Added 20 March 2010 by bridgetramperbridgetramper. 2 revisions, most recently 26 March 2010 by bridgetramperbridgetramper.